<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Style Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandyblair.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/the-style-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandyblair.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/the-style-council/</link>
	<description>only through praxis will we understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sandyblair</title>
		<link>http://sandyblair.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/the-style-council/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyblair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyblair.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-98</guid>
		<description>The bold question was a bit of a swizz, everybody seems to be getting it wrong, probably because I didn&#039;t word it as well as I could have done.

I&#039;ve been trying to work out the answer to the question &#039;how do you know if a particular wiki is any good&#039;. 

I particularly liked this blog post
http://strange.corante.com/archives/2008/04/29/the_importance_of_pigheadedness.php

And her highlighting of Clay Shirky&#039;s comment that most wiki&#039;s fail. Clay&#039;s answer to that is move on, try again, my answer (in an intranet) is sometimes it might be better to spot and fix the reasons for failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bold question was a bit of a swizz, everybody seems to be getting it wrong, probably because I didn&#8217;t word it as well as I could have done.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to work out the answer to the question &#8216;how do you know if a particular wiki is any good&#8217;. </p>
<p>I particularly liked this blog post<br />
<a href="http://strange.corante.com/archives/2008/04/29/the_importance_of_pigheadedness.php" rel="nofollow">http://strange.corante.com/archives/2008/04/29/the_importance_of_pigheadedness.php</a></p>
<p>And her highlighting of Clay Shirky&#8217;s comment that most wiki&#8217;s fail. Clay&#8217;s answer to that is move on, try again, my answer (in an intranet) is sometimes it might be better to spot and fix the reasons for failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ellwood</title>
		<link>http://sandyblair.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/the-style-council/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ellwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyblair.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-97</guid>
		<description>7/10 - I got less style :( 

[bold and u/l were my downfalls], but I agree witht he general thrust of the article, and I&#039;d think a wiki gardner would be quite entitled - natch - to move to chosen house style.

I&#039;d add that wikipedia has a lot of protected pages, so it isn&#039;t all free for all, and AFAICR you have to log in to edit some pages. 
[I&#039;ve done 2 wikipedia edits; hardcore!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7/10 &#8211; I got less style <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>[bold and u/l were my downfalls], but I agree witht he general thrust of the article, and I&#8217;d think a wiki gardner would be quite entitled &#8211; natch &#8211; to move to chosen house style.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d add that wikipedia has a lot of protected pages, so it isn&#8217;t all free for all, and AFAICR you have to log in to edit some pages.<br />
[I've done 2 wikipedia edits; hardcore!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
